I have the impression that very many problems in these modern times are consequences of some basic mechanical rationality and basic kind of philosophical classifications lacking from what people do, how they estimate what one can do and what not, what is wise enough in the world. Like is there in practice something really lot or only a short while, and what such a difference affects the quality of things dobe and how such makes sense in obe's lufe as a whole, is it balancedly enough, and what such choices affect kn the world at large, and did one's values and goals in practical situatilns change and how.
People doing something too long typically get tired. So when a short while outdoors like feels pleasant may be good for many or even all, longer periodsoutdoors need some endurancy, skills, mitivation, an emotional wish for such, or they tire, attention starts to neglect things and the person just dreams of going indoors, like one in stlmach oain hurries to toilet, but outdoors it seldom is pain, instead on just woukd feel the indoors more comfortable. So thise who spend most time outdoors, may many be squarely tjinking, while those who mist enjoy the beauty of nature are often a different group.
26th of September 2024 It is typical for people with narrow academical profession like some math like, that they may folliw the knowledge of their own profession but not any wider civiluced wisdom and may use their academical thinking ability to produce errors on purpise, since they kibd of think that other professions and other types of peopke produce mostly only nonsense. So one cannot use such professions as forefigures in applyibg academixal thinking, for example rough classifications, rough size estimates, estimates of the effects of those differencies, etc, since mostly they do not aim at getting them right, but instead have fun in producing outeageous errors, and so their communucation too often usn't clear enough for peopke with a different background.
No comments:
Post a Comment